US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,163
Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv12495
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sasinka v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv12431
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Sasinka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galbraith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv12479
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Veronica Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Andreuccetti v. Colvin
as 1:2024cv12449
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Andreuccetti
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kolar v. Colvin
as 1:2024cv12457
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Kolar
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Muhammad v. Colvin
as 1:2024cv12463
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Renfro Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Glascoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv12400
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Patricia Glascoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phelan v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv12352
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Becki Phelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Powell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50482
Plaintiff:
Troy Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Doty v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50483
Plaintiff:
Heather Doty
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.