US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 6,910
Fenwick-Kluth v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Patricia Fenwick-Kluth
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ana Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ray v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Knonuca Ray
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin v. Commissioner
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Franklin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Glasgow v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tia Marie Glasgow
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alnussairi v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Farah Alnussairi
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Biscan v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Biscan
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Halvorsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv50006
Plaintiff:
Gwen Halvorsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fondriest v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Fondriest
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holtapp v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50004
Plaintiff:
Stephen T Holtapp
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
