US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Real Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock v. Alliance Realty
as 1:2017cv06192
Plaintiff:
Juanita Newman Brock
Defendant:
Alliance Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells Fargo Bank v. Rapier et al
as 1:2017cv04894
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank
Defendant:
James Rapier, Bonnie Rapier, The Private Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Corbin et al
as 1:2017cv04082
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cynthia Corbin and All Unknown Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mickelson Brothers III LLC v. Turnbow et al
as 1:2017cv02920
Plaintiff:
Mickelson Brothers III LLC
Defendant:
Dewey E. Turnbow , Traci Turnbow and Unknown Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Dixon v. Jackson
as 1:2017cv02802
Plaintiff:
Elona Dixon
Defendant:
Garrett Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PMT NPL Financing 2015-1 v. Varan
as 1:2017cv02530
Plaintiff:
PMT NPL Financing 2015-1
Defendant:
Joseph Varan and Unknown Occupants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. McNair et al
as 1:2016cv10068
Defendant:
Angelia McNair and Unknown Occupants
Plaintiff:
Quentin Curtis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARHC CHSGDIL01, LLC et al v. MANAGCAR, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv09245
Plaintiff:
ARHC CHSGDIL01, LLC , ARHC CHPTNIL01, LLC , ARHC HHPEOIL01, LLC and others
Defendant:
Managcare, Inc. , Capitol Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre LLC , Colonial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
