Illinois Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 577
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 1:2025cv00521
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, State Bar of New York, John McAlary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis v. Palumbo et al
as 1:2024cv13318
Defendant:
Gingo Palumbo Law Group LLC, FCI Lender Services Inc. and Michael J Palumbo
Plaintiff:
Tomaine Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Corinth Treating Plant, LLC v. Western Fuels-Illinois, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02715
Plaintiff:
Corinth Treating Plant, LLC
Defendant:
Western Fuels-Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Barrios v. Corporate Bank of America
as 1:2024cv12685
Defendant:
Corporate Bank of America
Plaintiff:
Rosa Barrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Resipro, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11732
Defendant:
Resipro, LLC and Resicap, LP
Plaintiff:
Ronetta Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Grall v. Grall et al
as 4:2024cv04209
Defendant:
Renee Lynn Kroll Grall, G-Team PC, William Grall and others
Plaintiff:
Tara Grall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ANR Pipeline Company v. Bodway et al
as 3:2024cv50442
Defendant:
Bryan Bodway and Samantha Lacina
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cooley-Conway v. MidFirst Bank
as 1:2024cv11128
Plaintiff:
Madeleine Cooley-Conway
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Focht v. McDonalds Corporation
as 1:2024cv10893
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation
Plaintiff:
William Clark Focht, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Community Investments Corporation v. Saku
as 1:2024cv10787
Plaintiff:
Community Investments Corporation
Defendant:
Saku
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
