Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. Mueller Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05355
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Muhammad v. Bank of America
as 1:2014cv04687
Plaintiff:
Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Physician Care Services, S.C.,
as 1:2014cv02660
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Verhulst et al v. Quality Therapy & Consultation, Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv02083
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Ahmad et al
as 3:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Illinois, Kelsi Chick and others
Defendant:
Maqbool Ahmad, Keith Tyhurst, Marion Eye Center, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, et al. v. Walgreen Co., et al.
as 1:2014cv01558
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Chandra, M.D. v. Chandra, M.D. et al
as 1:2013cv08539
Plaintiff:
Rakesh Chandra, M.D.
Defendant:
Lokesh Chandra, M.D. and Robin B. Potter & Associates
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Suppressed v. Suppressed
as 1:2013cv06241
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Board of Trustees of Illinois Eastern Community Colleges
as 3:2013cv00875
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Illinois and Phillip E Edmondson
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of Illinois Eastern Community Colleges
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Mobile Doctors USA, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv05784
Plaintiff:
Suppressed
Defendant:
Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
