Kansas Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 152
McCluney v. City of Wichita, Kansas
as 6:2015cv01188
Plaintiff:
Richard McCluney
Defendant:
Wichita, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Williams et al vs. Nex-Tech Wireless, L.L.C.
as 5:2015cv04888
Plaintiff:
Brad E. Williams , Melinda Dougherty and Carol Kinderknecht
Defendant:
Nex-Tech Wireless, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jones et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2014cv02616
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones and Nick Hodges
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Miller v. PlattForm Advertising, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02607
Defendant:
PlattForm Advertising, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamela Miller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Fedd v. Earcare Group, LLC
as 6:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michelle Fedd
Defendant:
Earcare Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc., et al.
as 6:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO , District Lodge 70 and Local Lodge 839
Defendant:
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. and Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bigley v. Employment Security Board of Review et al
as 6:2014cv01083
Plaintiff:
John C. Bigley
Defendant:
Employment Security Board of Review and Darren Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vigliaturo v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02584
Plaintiff:
Vince Vigliaturo
Defendant:
American Bottling Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. De Soto Unified School District No. 232
as 2:2013cv02382
Plaintiff:
Kelly Hayden
Defendant:
De Soto Unified School District No. 232
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
