US District Court for the District of Nevada Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,446
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Campbell v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Celestial Campbell
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Felkner-Elliott v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Patricia Felkner-Elliott
Defendant:
P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Coleman v. Walgreen Co., doing business as Walgreens
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Marcus Coleman
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., doing business as Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Betancourt v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Kathy Betancourt
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ciolino-Terzoli v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Ciolino-Terzoli
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Mathis v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mathis
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks, Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Giannone v. Nevada Property 1, LLC
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Giannone
Defendant:
Nevada Property 1, LLC d/b/a The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Galarza et al v. Lascha
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Maribel Galarza and Sofia Jazmin Ramos Galarza
Defendant:
John Thomas Lascha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
