Nevada Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 851
Dick v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00328
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Alvin E. Dick
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Cohen v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv01367
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Larry Neil Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Collier v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01263
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Tamra Marie Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tusitino v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01241
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Saimalo Tusitino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Myers v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Charles Myers
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Penns v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01230
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Randal David Penns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wanless v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01225
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Michael Cory Wanless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lenor v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
Lashondre Lenor
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flowers v. Social Security Office et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Zachary Flowers
Defendant:
Social Security Office, M&T Bank and Raymond Clary
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Leyva v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Joe Charles Leyva
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
