US District Court for the Southern District of New York Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,877
Jenkins v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Weiss v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
Marek v. Immunogen, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gary Marek
Defendant:
Immunogen, Inc., Stephen C. McCluski, Stuart A. Arbuckle and others
Frascarelli v. Physicians Realty Trust et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mark Frascarelli and John White
Defendant:
Physicians Realty Trust, John T. Thomas, Tommy G. Thompson and others
Zappia v. Gan Limited et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zappia
Defendant:
Gan Limited, Seamus McGill, Michael Smurfit and others
Clark et al v. System1, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Brian Clark, JBC Structured Products LLC and Marathon Capital LLC
Defendant:
System1, Inc., a Delaware limited company and System1, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Peterson v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Peterson
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
Calenture, LLC et al v. Shiff et al
as 1:2023cv11238
Plaintiff:
Calenture, LLC and Revive Investing LLC
Defendant:
Barry Shiff, Aleta Shiff, Symetryx Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al v. GEM Global Yield LLC SCS et al
as 1:2023cv11268
Plaintiff:
Mullen Automotive, Inc. and Mullen Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
GEM Global Yield LLC SCS, GEM Yield Bahamas Limited and Christopher F Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
