US District Court for the Southern District of New York Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 627
Abramson v. Schreck
as 1:2022cv10249
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
casey schreck
Plaintiff:
Frederic Abramson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Pollas v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10207
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Pollas
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gabriel et al v. Sweetgreen, Inc.
as 1:2022cv09588
Plaintiff:
Juan Gabriel and George Santiago
Defendant:
Sweetgreen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Reynoso v. FMS New York Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv09595
Plaintiff:
jennifer reynoso
Defendant:
fms new york services, llc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Vasquez v. Starbucks Coffee Company
as 1:2022cv09596
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Vasquez
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
CRC Insurance Services, Inc. v. Suh
as 1:2022cv09528
Plaintiff:
CRC Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
James Suh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cestaro v. Prohaska et al
as 1:2022cv09444
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cestaro
Defendant:
Michael Prohaska and Construction and General Building Laborers Local 79
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Orgill v. Better Holdco, Inc.
as 1:2022cv09410
Plaintiff:
AMMON ORGILL
Defendant:
Better Holdco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Santiago v. The Children's Place, Inc.
as 1:2022cv09378
Plaintiff:
George Santiago
Defendant:
The Children's Place, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Spiegler v. Mish Mish Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08774
Plaintiff:
Gal Spiegler
Defendant:
Mish Mish Inc. and Mishelle Weinerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
