US District Court for the Western District of New York Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 290
v. Lt game Canada ltd
as 1:2013cv00751
Defendant:
Lt game Canada ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
GS Cleantech Corporation v. Western New York Energy, LLC
as 1:2013cv00724
Plaintiff:
GS Cleantech Corporation
Defendant:
Western New York Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Opticool Technologies, LLC v. Liebert Corporation
as 6:2013cv06350
Plaintiff:
Opticool Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Liebert Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Omni-ID USA, Inc. v. Xerafy
as 6:2013cv06266
Plaintiff:
Omni-ID USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Xerafy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Semrock, Inc. v. Edmund Optics, Inc., et al.,
as 1:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Semrock, Inc.
Defendant:
Edmund Optics, Inc. and Edmund Optical Manufacturing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Semrock, Inc. v. Edmund Optics, Inc., et al.,
as 6:2013cv06265
Plaintiff:
Semrock, Inc.
Defendant:
Edmund Optics, Inc. and Edmund Optical Manufacturing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Umbra, LLC v. Appliance Parts Stop
as 1:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Umbra, LLC
Defendant:
Appliance Parts Stop
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Automated Transactions LLC v. Chemung Canal Trust CO.
as 6:2013cv06169
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
Chemung Canal Trust CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Automated Transactions LLC v. Genesee Regional Bank
as 6:2013cv06166
Plaintiff:
Automated Transactions LLC
Defendant:
Genesee Regional Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
CUTV Forensics, Inc. v. Linear LLC
as 1:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
CUTV Forensics, Inc.
Defendant:
Linear LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
