New York Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,728
Data Resonance LLC v. Ziff Davis, Inc. (Sugarsync)
as 1:2024cv10002
Plaintiff:
Data Resonance LLC
Defendant:
Ziff Davis, Inc. (Sugarsync)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. LetsGetChecked, INC.

as 1:2024cv10016
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
LetsGetChecked, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Yuhuanhongshengmaoyiyouxiangongsi v. Dbest Products, Inc.,

as 1:2024cv10019
Plaintiff:
Yuhuanhongshengmaoyiyouxiangongsi and Aocoom
Defendant:
Dbest Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conexus LLC v. Datadog, Inc.

as 1:2024cv09998
Plaintiff:
Conexus LLC
Defendant:
Datadog, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Group Dekko, Inc. et al v. Metro Light & Power, LLC
as 1:2024cv09981
Plaintiff:
Furnlite Inc. and Group Dekko, Inc.
Defendant:
Metro Light & Power LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Err Content IP, LLC v. Spotify USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv09530
Defendant:
Spotify USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Err Content IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Better Houseware Corporation v. Dorai Home, Inc.
as 1:2024cv08498
Plaintiff:
Better Houseware Corporation
Defendant:
Dorai Home, Inc.
Counter-Claimant:
Dorai Home, Inc.
Counter-Defendant:
Better Houseware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Sqip, LLC v. Ultra Stones, LLC
as 2:2024cv08401
Defendant:
ULTRA STONES, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sqip, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Mesa Digital, LLC v. US Mobile, Inc.

as 1:2024cv09130
Plaintiff:
Mesa Digital, LLC
Defendant:
US Mobile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Muvox LLC v. Netaktion LLC

as 1:2024cv09137
Defendant:
Netaktion LLC
Plaintiff:
Muvox LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.