New York Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,944
Bueno v. Visa Inc.
as 1:2024cv09976
Defendant:
Visa Inc.
Plaintiff:
Spencer Bueno
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Fletcher v. Visa, Inc.
as 1:2024cv09884
Defendant:
Visa Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dianne Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pantano v. Visa, Inc.
as 1:2024cv09890
Defendant:
Visa, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Pantano
Intervenor:
NDA Aesthetics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Rumble Canada, Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2024cv09904
Defendant:
Google L.L.C and Alphabet Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rumble Canada Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Jenkins v. Visa, Inc.
as 1:2024cv09430
Defendant:
Visa, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Griffith v. Visa Inc.
as 1:2024cv09374
Defendant:
Visa Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lindy Griffith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Broadway Grill, LLC v. Visa Inc.
as 1:2024cv08422
Plaintiff:
Broadway Grill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
NDA Aesthetics, LLC et al v. Visa Inc.
as 1:2024cv08269
Plaintiff:
NDA Aesthetics, LLC and Warren Imports, LLC and all others simiarly situated doing business as Subaru World of Hackettstown
Defendant:
Visa Inc.
Interested Party:
Richard Pantano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Yabla Inc. v. Visa Inc.,
as 1:2024cv08045
Defendant:
Visa Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Yabla Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Kevranian d/b/a Nuts for Candy et al v. Visa Inc.
as 1:2024cv07997
Defendant:
Visa Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nourijan Kevranian d/b/a Nuts for Candy and Cathy Houts
Interested Party:
Richard Pantano
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
