Northern District of Oklahoma Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,230
Ackerman-Parrot v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00522
Plaintiff: Dina F Ackerman-Parrot
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00500
Plaintiff: Roy Nichols
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rott v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00493
Plaintiff: Chad W Rott
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jefferson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00490
Plaintiff: Neliaseya B Jefferson
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Krouse v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00469
Plaintiff: Anna M Krouse
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dedmon v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00463
Plaintiff: Margo Dedmon
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dover v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00458
Plaintiff: Joshua M Dover
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Estel v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00447
Plaintiff: Ricky L Estel
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Price v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00409
Plaintiff: Linda M Price
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sawyer v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00406
Plaintiff: Christopher S Sawyer
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?