US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 342
Caruso Law Firm, P.C. et al v. Mattingly & Roselius, PLLC et al
as 4:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Caruso Law Firm, P.C. , Smolen, Smolen & Roytman, PLLC and Law Office of Dale Lipsmeyer
Defendant:
Mattingly & Roselius, PLLC, Kessler, Topaz, Meltzer & Cheek, LLP, Gordon, Caruth & Virden, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Horton v. Southwest Medical Consulting, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Sam LeBarre Horton
Defendant:
Southwest Medical Consulting, LLC, Molina Healthcare, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S & J Rentals v. Hilti, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
S & J Rentals
Defendant:
Hilti, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Spahn v. Navient Solutions, LLC
as 4:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Molly Spahn
Defendant:
Navient Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rabin v. Bartlesville Development Authority et al
as 4:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joel Rabin
Defendant:
Bartlesville Development Authority , Bartlesville Investment Partners, LLC and GBT Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Equity Trust Company et al
as 4:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Defendant:
Equity Trust Company and Elizabeth A Zigrang
Cross_claimant:
Equity Trust Company
Cross_defendant:
Elizabeth A Zigrang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Quasco, LLC v. Hocutt
as 4:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Quasco, LLC
Defendant:
James Robert Hocutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Albanidia Perez
Defendant:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARI, Inc. v. Cell Phone Surgeon LLC
as 4:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
ARI, Inc.
Defendant:
Cell Phone Surgeon LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
United States of America v. Lee
as 4:2016cv00427
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert H Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
