US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Blalock et al v. Freedom From Pain Institute LLC
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Carrol Blalock
Defendant:
Freedom From Pain Institute LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davis et al v. Ponca Organic LLC
as 5:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Lauren Davis
Defendant:
Ponca Organic LLC doing business as Stillwater Dispensary
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cherry v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 5:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cherry v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Feroli et al v. The Welfary LLC
as 5:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Nathan Feroli
Defendant:
The Welfary LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tyner v. Hi Q Inc
as 5:2021cv00608
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services Inc and Hi Q Inc doing business as Health IQ Inc
Plaintiff:
Tara Armado and Maki Tyner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Still-Dobson et al v. BRSI LLC
as 5:2021cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Still-Dobson
Defendant:
BRSI LLC doing business as Big Red Kia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Smith et al v. Bonzinni Enterprises LLC
as 5:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
Cody Smith
Defendant:
Bonzinni Enterprises LLC an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company doing business as Likewise Cannabis of Stillwater
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Nettnay et al v. Lifeshield National Insurance Co
as 5:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Candy Workman and James Nettnay
Defendant:
Lifeshield National Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
