US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,258
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prosperity Bank v. Coltrane Properties LTD et al
as 5:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Bank
Defendant:
Coltrane Properties LTD, Miles L Mitzner, Carey E Jones and others
Garnishee:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Blalock et al v. Freedom From Pain Institute LLC
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Carrol Blalock
Defendant:
Freedom From Pain Institute LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mak v. Dunham et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Paul T Mak
Defendant:
Theodore R Dunham and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Master Saddles LLC v. Kerr et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Master Saddles LLC
Defendant:
Shannon Kerr and SK Equine Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
