US District Court for the District of Utah Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,120
Alfwear v. Windsong Brands LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Alfwear
Defendant:
Windsong Brands and CloudVeil Mountain Peak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
KIHOMAC v. Meosphere et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
KIHOMAC
Defendant:
Meosphere doing business as Lightning Kite, Emergent 3 and Preston Keller
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Robbie Co. LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
Robbie Co. LLC, J.P. Original Corp., Forever 21, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DP Creations v. Jihong
as 2:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
DP Creations a Utah limited liability company doing business as Bountiful Baby
Defendant:
Miao Jihong an unknown business entity doing business as US-Amozon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Stepstone Connect v. Toone
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stepstone Connect
Defendant:
Barry Clark Toone
DP Creations v. Chen Lin
as 2:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
DP Creations a Utah limited liability company doing business as Bountiful Baby
Defendant:
Chen Lin an unknown business entity doing business as EIVVFIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TMRR v. CBC Mortgage Agency
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
TMRR
Defendant:
CBC Mortgage Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
M&M Gutters v. M&M Exteriors et al
as 2:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
M&M Gutters a Utha corporation doing business as M&M Gutters and Exteriors
Defendant:
M&M Exteriors and Mike Odiel Maldonado Medina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bala Bangles Inc. v. EA Commerce LLC
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bala Bangles Inc.
Defendant:
EA Commerce LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
