US District Court for the District of Utah Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Anglesey v. USA et al
as 2:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathryn Anglesey
Defendant:
USA, George Wahlen Veterans Administration Hospital, Clint D. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Carchidi v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00444
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Carchidi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson et al v. Wal-Mart
as 2:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richard Johnson , James Randy Johnson , Ronnie Delbert Johnson and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Temple v. Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings et al
as 2:2010cv00914
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Temple
Defendant:
Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings, Ashley Valley Medical Center, Mountain Valley Imaging of Eastern Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betz v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Leslie Dale Betz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Orenstein v. USA
as 2:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
Edmond Orenstein
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bean v. USA
as 2:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
James S. Bean and James S. Bean
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lee et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee and Sherril Lee
Defendant:
State of Utah, University of Utah Health Sciences Center and United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Segura et al v. USA
as 2:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Segura and Marie Segura
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Christensen et al v. Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joan Christensen and Arthur Christensen
Defendant:
Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah, Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah, Powel, Chester Badollet Estate of and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
