US District Court for the District of Utah Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Porter v. Zimmer et al
as 1:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Neal Porter
Defendant:
Zimmer , Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Edmison v. Biomet Orthopedics
as 1:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edmison
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mott et al v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
Diane V. Mott and Mark Mott
Defendant:
Zimmer , Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer US
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Smith v. Terumo Cardiovascular Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00998
Plaintiff:
Buzzie Smith
Defendant:
Terumo Cardiovascular Systems , Terumo and Terumo Americas Holding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Peters et al v. Biomet Orthopedics et al
as 2:2012cv00948
Plaintiff:
Suzanne K. Peters and Steven Peters
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics and Biomet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davies v. Zimmer Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv00885
Plaintiff:
Harley Davies
Defendant:
Zimmer Incorporated, Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Champlin v. Zimmer et al
as 1:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Richard Champlin
Defendant:
Zimmer, Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. Zimmer Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv00886
Plaintiff:
Debbie Robbins
Defendant:
Zimmer Incorporated, Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase v. Encision
as 2:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chase
Defendant:
Encision
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Madsen et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Conni C. Madsen and Charles H. Madsen
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and American Medical Systems Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
