US District Court for the District of Utah Torts - Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 249
Simpkins v. Wright
as 2:2019cv00236
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Simpkins
Defendant:
Terri Simpkins Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Danielle E. Shaner and Dustin C. Thomas
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Andrews and Thomas E. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RHA Blue LLC v. Colvin et al
as 2:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Saltwater Biocides, John Mayer, Jim Aamodt and others
Plaintiff:
RHA Blue LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hosmer et al v. Esquire Bank NA et al
as 1:2018cv00124
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Esquire Bank NA and Citibank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Art Hosmer and Bert Rosenquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v. Norman et al
as 2:2018cv00715
Defendant:
Cindy Gagliano, Harvey Cohen and Don Roger Norman
Plaintiff:
Dean H. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. American Investment Group of New York, L.P. Pension Plan et al
as 2:2018cv00678
Defendant:
American Investment Group Of New York, L.P. Pension Plan and Stacey Kaminer
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fluent Home LTD et al v. Elbaum et al
as 2:2018cv00570
Defendant:
Chad Bingham and Jack Elbaum
Plaintiff:
Fluent Home LTD and Fluent Home LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
SKAT v. Moira Associates LLC 401K Plan et al
as 2:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
Moira Associates LLC 401K Plan and Stacey Kaminer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. Linden Associates Defined Benefit Plan et al
as 2:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
Linden Associates Defined Benefit Plan and Joan Schulman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. Kamco Investments Inc Pension Plan et al
as 2:2018cv00454
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
Kamco Investments Inc Pension Plan and Stacey Kaminer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
