US District Court for the District of Vermont Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Automated Transactions, LLC v. Connecticut River Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00236
Plaintiff: Automated Transactions, LLC
Defendant: Connecticut River Bank, N.A. and Connecticut River Bancorp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
HIP Innovations, LLC et al v. Shurtech Brands, LLC
as 2:2011cv00200
Plaintiff: HIP Innovations, LLC and Hampton Direct, Inc.
Defendant: Shurtech Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arnouse Digital Devices Corp. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00155
Plaintiff: Arnouse Digital Devices Corp.
Defendant: Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Revision Military, Inc. et al v. Balboa Manufacturing Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00149
Plaintiff: Revision Military, Inc. and Revision Military, Ltd.
Defendant: Balboa Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vivelle Ventures LLC et al v. Mylan Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00050
Plaintiff: Vivelle Ventures LLC , Novern Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant: Mylan Technologies, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mylan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Americans For Fair Patent Use, LLC v. The Orvis Company, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00039
Plaintiff: Americans For Fair Patent Use LLC
Defendant: The Orvis Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAB Partners Associates, Inc. v. Phottix (HK), Ltd. et al
as 5:2011cv00005
Plaintiff: LAB Partners Associates, Inc.
Defendant: Phottix (HK), Ltd. and Eternal Fortune (HK), Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MBW Technologies, LLC et al v. Reliable Racing Supply, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00297
Plaintiff: MBW Technologies, LLC , World Cup Supply, Inc. and SPM S.p.A.
Defendant: Reliable Racing Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hubbardton Forge, LLC v. Artcraft Electric LTD. et al
as 2:2010cv00063
Plaintiff: Hubbardton Forge, LLC
Defendant: Artcraft Electric LTD. and Artcraft of Montreal, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Highlands Override, Inc. v. Excentus Corporation
as 1:2009cv00273
Plaintiff: Highlands Override, Inc. and Highlands Override, Inc.
Defendant: Excentus Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?