Vermont Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Green v. Springfield Medical Care Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Green
Defendant:
Springfield Medical Care Systems, Inc. and Springfield Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Desantis v. Pegues
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ann-Marie Desantis
Defendant:
John E. Pegues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haywood v. St. Michael's College et al
as 2:2012cv00164
Plaintiff:
John D. Haywood
Defendant:
St. Michael's College , Logan R. Spillane and Christopher Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridler v. McCloskey
as 2:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ridler
Defendant:
Jeffrey F. McCloskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shovah v. Mercure et al
as 2:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Shova
Defendant:
Gary Mercure and Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Natural Bridge Holdings, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC
as 2:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Natural Bridge Holdings, LLC and Michael Connors
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maunsell v. WCAX TV et al
as 5:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Francis Maunsell
Defendant:
WCAX TV, Peter Martin, Marselis Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Clevenger
as 5:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Russell Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maunsell v. Parsons et al
as 5:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
David Francis Maunsell
Defendant:
Marselis Parsons, Brian Joyce, Peter Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Bushey v. City of Burlington Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lennie J. Bushey
Defendant:
City of Burlington Police Department, Officer Ferris, Officer Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
