US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Acosta, R. v. Adherence Finishing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00509
Defendant:
Scott Swanson, Adherence Finishing, Inc. and Craig Swanson
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Acosta, R. v. Twin Bear Express, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00294
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Twin Bear Express, LLC and Pamela Ellenberger
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 31105
Rozumalski, Laura v. W.F. Baird & Associates, Ltd.
as 3:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Rozumalski
Defendant:
W.F. Baird & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Badger, Curt v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
as 3:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
Curt Badger
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schnebbe, David v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
David A. Schnebbe
Defendant:
Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 31105
United States of America v. Roofing Specialist, LLC
as 3:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roofing Specialist, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Wussow, Michael v. Bruker Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Wussow
Defendant:
Bruker Corporation, Bruker Nano, Inc., Michael Szulczewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Bogenschneider, Bret v. Kimberly Clark Global Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Bret N. Bogenschneider
Defendant:
Kimberly Clark Global Sales, LLC and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
United States of America v. Roofing Specialist, LLC
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roofing Specialist, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
