Harris v. CVS Caremark Corporation
||Roger D. Harris
||CVS Caremark Corporation
||February 22, 2011
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Virginia Emerson Hopkins
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 1, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 120 MOTION for New Trial or Remittitur Pursuant to Rule 59. The Court hereby DENIES the Motion insofar as it seeks a complete new trial, and GRANTS the Motion and hereby ORD ERS a new trial, limited to the issue of damages. Further, the court hereby VACATES its award of $800,000.00. In all other respects, the judgment stands. In light of this Order, the Court finds that all remaining pending motions (docs. 111, 112, 113, 114, 117, and 118) are DENIED as moot and/or premature. The Court will, by separate Order, set a final Pretrial Conference for the new trial on damages only. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 5/1/2014. (JLC)
|February 25, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER DENYING 119 RENEWED MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/25/2014. (JLC)
|January 29, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment as set out herein. The Court will set a Final Pretrial Conference by separate Order. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 1/29/2013. (JLC)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?