Cofield v. Allstate Indemnity Company

Plaintiff: Christopher Cofield
Defendant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv02100
Filed: June 7, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Eastern Office
County: Calhoun
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 28, 2014 16 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER; Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts II, III and IV is granted and these counts are dismissed with prejudice as more fully set out in order. Signed by Magistrate-Judge Harwell G Davis, III on 01/28/14. (SPT )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cofield v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Cofield
Represented By: Richard J Laird, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allstate Indemnity Company
Represented By: T E Bazemore, III
Represented By: Margaret H Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?