Smith v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
| Dorothy Smith |
| Cigna Corporation, Life Insurance Company of North America and Honda Manufacturing Health & Welfare Benefits Plan |
| 1:2013cv02047 |
| November 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Eastern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting in part and Deferring in part 53 MOTION to Compel LINA to Respond to Plaintiff's Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed by Dorothy Smith, and Granting 76 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Life Insurance Company of North America.. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/30/14. (KWC, )
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 11 MOTION to Dismiss and Honda Plan is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from Ms. Smith's lawsuit. GRANTING 19 MOTION to Dismiss and Cigna is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction. GRANTING 20 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Count II of Ms. Smith Amended Complaint is HEREBY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Cigna Corporation and Honda Manufacturing Health & Welfare Benefits Plan (Plan No. 501) terminated.(JLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
