Dodd v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Timonty Michael Dodd
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 1:2015cv00085
Filed: January 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Eastern Office
County: Calhoun
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/10/2016. (AVC)
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/9/2016. (AVC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dodd v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timonty Michael Dodd
Represented By: Ronnie Michael Booker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?