Hunter v. Leeds, City of et al
| Ronald Hunter, Jr |
| Leeds, City of, Bryan Jackson, Zack Kirk, R C Reaves, J Shields, B Chalian and A R Holman |
| 1:2015cv02266 |
| December 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Eastern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons set forth above, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. 110 ). The court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's "Negligent Supervision and Training" (Cou nt III) claim against the City of Leeds, "Deliberate Indifference (Monell)" (Count IV) claim against the City of Leeds, and "Civil Conspiracy" (Count VI) claim against both the City of Leeds and Officer Kirk. The court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's "Tort of Outrage" (Count V) claim against the City of Leeds but DENIES Officer Kirk's motion to dismiss the "Tort of Outrage" claim brought against him at this time. The court dismisses Plaintiff's claims with prejudice because of the many opportunities Plaintiff has had to properly plead his claims. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 8/11/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 12/4/2020. (KAM)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/31/17. (SAC )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
