Steed v. Romero, et al
Plaintiff: Robert Steed
Defendant: Romero, Hansen, A Moore and J Blake-Gaston
Case Number: 1:2018cv01687
Filed: October 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Referring Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Filing 5 RESPONSE to the Court's #4 Order to Show Cause filed by Robert Steed. (JLC)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show cause in writing and under oath within fifteen (15) days why the court should not dismiss this action for failure to comply with the October 17, 2018 notice. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. Signed by Judge Staci G. Cornelius on 11/28/2018. (KWC) (Attachment added on 11/28/2018: #(1) IFP app) (KWC)
November 14, 2018 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hansen, Romero, A Moore, J Blake-Gaston, filed by Robert Steed.(KWC)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Complaint, NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING; Petitioner's pleading is deficient for the reasons indicated. Petitioner must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order in the manner explained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/17/2018. (KWC)
October 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hansen, Romero filed by Robert Steed. (Attachments: #(1) Envelope, #(2) Exhibit A, #(3) Exhibit B, #(4) Exhibit C, #(5) Exhibit D, #(6) Exhibit E, #(7) Exhibit F, #(8) Exhibit G, #(9) Exhibit H, #(10) Exhibit I, #(11) Exhibit J, #(12) Exhibit K, #(13) Exhibit L, #(14) Exhibit M,#15Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit Q, #(17) Exhibit -Elec email to Ms Hansen 10-3-2018)(KWC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steed v. Romero, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Steed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hansen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Blake-Gaston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?