Marbury et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
| Patrick Marbury and Jocelyn Marbury |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
| 1:2018cv01879 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER governing further proceedings in this action unless modified for good cause shown: Discovery due by 9/30/2019; Dispositive Motions due by 12/19/2019; Joint Status Report due by 8/30/2019. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 12/28/18. (SAC )
|
| Filing 4 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Sewell, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Wal-Mart Stores Inc (TLM, ) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores Inc.(TLM, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores Inc from Circuit Court of Talladega Al, case number 61-cv-2018-900415.00. (), filed by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(TLM, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3217532. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores Inc from Circuit Court of Talladega Al, case number 61-cv-2018-900415.00. (), filed by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(TLM, ). (Sewell, Robert) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601093510 (TLM, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
