Riggins v. Crannford et al
| Jaylin Dwyette Riggins |
| Calhoun County Jail, Officer Whiteside, Lt. Chames, Officer Roszell and Megan Crannford |
| 1:2019cv00221 |
| February 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons stated above, the undersigned RECOMMENDS this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for the plaintiffs failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 4/2/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay an Initial Partial Filing Fee of $13.76 in order to commence this action, plaintiff is also required to sign and return the attached Prisoner Consent Form within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this Order or the complaint will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 2/8/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jaylin Dwyette Riggins. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lt. Chames, Megan Crannford, Officer Roszell, Officer Whiteside, Calhoun County Jail, filed by Jaylin Dwyette Riggins.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
