Swain v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Petitioner: Nattie Swain
Respondent: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv00373
Filed: March 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Karon O Bowdre
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. 9), the court ORDERS that this case be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys fees costs. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/24/2019. (FNC)
April 24, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nattie Swain (Carpenter, Jonathan)
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS #7 "Respondent AT&T Mobility LLC's Unopposed Motion for Brief Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Motion to Modify Award of Arbitrator." AT&T Mobility LLC's response is now due on or before April 25, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 4/11/19. (CAK2)
April 11, 2019 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Modify Arbitration Award by AT&T Mobility, LLC. (Jackson, Matthew)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 "Respondent AT&T Mobility LLC's Unopposed Motion for Brief Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Motion to Modify Award of Arbitrator." AT&T Mobility LLC's response is now due on or before April 11, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/27/19. (MMW)
March 27, 2019 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Modify Arbitration Award by AT&T Mobility, LLC. (Jackson, Matthew)
March 12, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nattie Swain. AT&T Mobility, LLC served on 3/7/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. (JLC)
March 5, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AT&T Mobility, LLC via certified U.S. Mail on this the 5th day of March, 2019. (JLC)
March 5, 2019 Filing Fee received in the amount of $400.00, Credit Card receipt_number 1126-3292948, NDAL receipt #B4601095863. (Carpenter, Jonathan) Modified on 3/5/2019 (JLC).
March 1, 2019 COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility, LLC, filed by Nattie Swain. (See document 1).(JLC)
March 1, 2019 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Nattie Swain. (Carpenter, Jonathan)
March 1, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION TO MODIFY AWARD OF ARBITRATOR AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION by Nattie Swain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Exhibit E-N, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC) Modified on 3/5/2019 (JLC, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swain v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Represented By: Matthew Ryan Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nattie Swain
Represented By: Jonathan Gabriel Carpenter
Represented By: Harvey B Campbell, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?