Rodriguez v. Supervalu
Plaintiff: Lyle Rodriguez
Defendant: Supervalu
Case Number: 1:2019cv01230
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/28/19. (SAC)
August 27, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Protective Order by Supervalu. (Saville, Christopher)
August 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER governing further proceedings in this action unless modified for good cause shown - Discovery due by 5/5/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 7/15/2020; Joint Status Report due by 4/6/2020. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/25/19. (SAC )
August 16, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Horn, Allwin)
August 14, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Brian Saville on behalf of Supervalu (Saville, Christopher)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/12/19. (SAC )
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER. On August 12, 2019, the court held a teleconference at which Plaintiff conceded that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and that Defendant is a citizen of Delaware and Minnesota, but not of Alabama, so that the parties are completely diverse. Accordingly, the court finds that it has diversity jurisdiction over this case. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/12/2019. (RLW)
August 12, 2019 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Annemarie Carney Axon: Telephone Conference held on 8/12/2019. (SAC )
August 8, 2019 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B460109704 (KAM)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER - The court sets a Telephone Conference for August 12, 2019, 10:30 AM, before Judge Annemarie Carney Axon. Counsel will receive the numbers required to join the call via e-mail. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/6/19. (SAC )
August 1, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Supervalu. (KEK)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Supervalu. (KEK)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Supervalu from Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama, case number 11-cv-2019-900478, filed by Supervalu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate of Removal)(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Supervalu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyle Rodriguez
Represented By: Joshua W Wright
Represented By: Allwin E Horn, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supervalu
Represented By: Virginia F Gambacurta
Represented By: Glenn E Ireland
Represented By: Christopher Brian Saville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?