Doe v. Webb et al
| Richard Doe |
| Wesley "Wes" Brooks, Dawson Winningham and Robert "Clay" Webb |
| 1:2019cv01996 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Corey L Maze |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER re Plaintiff's motions for extension of time #15 #16 and Defendant Brook's response #17 . The Court hereby EXTENDS Plaintiff's deadline to file his response to Friday, February 21, 2020. Defendants have until Friday, March 6, 2020, to file replies, but they may file sooner if they so choose. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/4/2020. (SRD)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants' Dispositive Motions, #16 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Wesley "Wes" Brooks. (Carr, Clay) |
| Filing 16 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time by Richard Doe. (Mastando, Teresa) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants' Dispositive Motions by Richard Doe. (Mastando, Teresa) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Dana L Rice on behalf of Robert "Clay" Webb (Rice, Dana) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Proceed Under a Pseudonym filed by Richard Doe. (Mastando, Teresa) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Wesley "Wes" Brooks. (Carr, Clay) |
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER: The Court, having been advised that neither defendant Winningham nor defendant Brooks intends to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym (doc. #2 ), hereby sets Thursday, January 23, 2020, as the deadline for Plaintiff to reply to defendant Webb's Response (doc. #8 ). Any reply filed by Plaintiff is limited to 15 pages, double-spaced. The Court, having been advised that defendant Brooks intends to file a dispositive motion, hereby sets the following briefing schedule. Plaintiff shall have 21 days, from the date Brooks files his motion, to file one consolidated response to the defendants' dispositive motions. Plaintiff's response, if any, is limited to 30 pages, double-spaced, but this page limit may be extended for good cause. Defendants shall have 14 days, from the date a response is filed, to file replies, each of which is limited to 10 pages, double-spaced. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 1/9/2020. (SRD)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Corey L. Maze: Telephone Conference held on 1/9/2020. (SRD) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER setting a Telephone Status Conference for 3:00pm on Thursday, January 9, 2020. Call-in information will be sent to the parties. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 1/8/2020. (SRD)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 1/7/2020. (SRD)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Proceed Under a Pseudonym filed by Robert "Clay" Webb. (Bradford, William) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Robert "Clay" Webb. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in Support)(Bradford, William) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Clay R Carr on behalf of Wesley "Wes" Brooks (Carr, Clay) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Wesley "Wes" Brooks.(Boardman, Mark) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Dawson Winningham. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Stubbs, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wesley "Wes" Brooks, Robert "Clay" Webb, Dawson Winningham delivered to plaintiff for service. (AKD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Under a Pseudonym by Richard Doe. (Artrip, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wesley "Wes" Brooks, Robert "Clay" Webb, Dawson Winningham, filed by Richard Doe.(KEK) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601102655 (AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
