Marable v. Calhoun County Jail
| Tyler Marable |
| Calhoun County Jail |
| 1:2020cv00081 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - In Mr. Marable's second amended complaint, he reasserts the same factual allegations but changes the defendant from the Calhoun County Jail to Calhoun County, Alabama. (Compare Doc. #4 with Doc. #6 ). However, as the court will explain below, Calhoun County is not subject to liability for the actions of the Jail's employees or policymakers, and Mr. Marable's factual allegations do not appear to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Marable to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before March 16, 2020, why the court should not dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 3/2/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 6 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Calhoun County Jail, Calhoun County, Alabama, filed by Tyler Marable.(KEK) Modified on 2/27/2020 (KEK). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - For the reasons set out below, the court DISMISSES Mr. Marable's request for injunctive relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing. The court ORDERS Mr. Marable to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before March 5, 2020, why the court should not dismiss the rest of his complaint for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 2/6/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Calhoun County Jail, filed by Tyler Marable.(KEK) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Because Mr. Marable's affidavit attached to his application to proceed in forma pauperis demonstrates that he is unable to prepay the filing fee or give security, the court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. #2 ). The court DEFERS RULING on the motion to appointment counsel. (Doc. #2 ). The complaint gives no indication that Mr. Marable himself faces a real and immediate threat of detention at the Calhoun County Jail. (See Doc. #1 ). Accordingly, the court ORDERS Mr. Marable to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before March 5, 2020, why the court should not dismiss this complaint for lack of standing. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 1/23/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyler Marable. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calhoun County Jail, filed by Tyler Marable.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marable v. Calhoun County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyler Marable | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Calhoun County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
