Lewis v. Fulmer et al
| Robert Lewis |
| Robert E Fulmer, John Gillney, Jimmy Johns, Christie Brinkley and Michael Weiser |
| 1:2020cv00287 |
| March 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Corey L Maze |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Christie Brinkley, Robert E Fulmer, John Gillney, Jimmy Johns, Michael Weiser, filed by Robert Lewis.(KEK) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; deferring ruling on #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Lewis is ORDERED to file an amended complaint correcting the pleading deficits noted herein, and including his specific claims and specific allegations that relate to each of these claims, by April 8, 2020. Lewis is advised that should he fail to timely file his amended complaint evidencing viable claims over which this court has jurisdiction, this action will be subject to dismissal without further notice. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 3/20/20. (SRD)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Robert Lewis. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christie Brinkley, Robert E Fulmer, John Gillney, Jimmy Johns, Michael Weiser, filed by Robert Lewis.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
