Phillips v. Virginia Transportation Corporation
Derek Phillips |
Virginia Transportation Corporation |
1:2020cv00888 |
June 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER regarding compliance with Rule 26; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/16/2020; Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/12/2020. (BST, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than September 24, 2020. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after September 24, 2020. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 11:00 a.m. on August 28, 2020. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/12/20. (MRR, ) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Virginia Transportation Corporation. filed by Virginia Transportation Corporation (Miller, T) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Virginia Transportation Corporation.(Miller, T) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Phillips. Virginia Transportation Corporation served on 7/20/2020 (no date on green card), answer due 8/10/2020. (MRR, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Virginia Transportation Corporation, sent via certified mail (MRR, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Derek Phillips. (MRR, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Virginia Transportation Corporation, filed by Derek Phillips.(MRR, ) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3616172 (B4601106732). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Virginia Transportation Corporation, filed by Derek Phillips.(MRR, ). (Pantazis, Evan) Modified on 6/25/2020 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Phillips v. Virginia Transportation Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Virginia Transportation Corporation | |
Represented By: | T Matthew Miller |
Represented By: | Cortlin Lee Bond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Derek Phillips | |
Represented By: | Dennis George Pantazis, Jr |
Represented By: | Evan Dennis Pantazis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.