BWW Inc v. Brigham et al
BWW Inc doing business as SERVPRO of Birmingham |
James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth and David Thompson |
1:2021cv00470 |
April 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Corey L Maze |
Other Fraud |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth, David Thompson. (Morse, Wayne) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by BWW Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Smith, Bradley) |
Filing 15 TEXT ORDER GRANTING unopposed motion for extension of time #14 . Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to dismiss is now due on May 21, 2021. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on May 28, 2021. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 5/11/2021. (KEK) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 5/21/2021; Replies due by 5/28/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 Response in Support of Motion, #8 MOTION to Dismiss by BWW Inc. (Smith, Bradley) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley J Smith on behalf of BWW Inc (Smith, Bradley) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER GRANTING motion to stay discovery and rule 26 obligations #10 . The court hereby STAYS the parties' deadlines under Rule 26 pending its ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss #8 . Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 5/5/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff shall have until Friday, May 14, 2021 to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss #8 and supporting brief #9 . Plaintiff's brief shall not exceed 25 pages, double-spaced, 14-point font. Defendants may file a reply brief by Friday, May 21, 2021, which shall not exceed 10 pages, double-spaced, 14-point font. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 4/30/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Discovery and Rule 26 Obligations Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss by James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth, David Thompson. (Morse, Wayne) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth, David Thompson. (Morse, Wayne) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth, David Thompson. (Morse, Wayne) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to re #3 Motion to Show Cause Order filed by BWW Inc. (Hair, Barry) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BWW Inc. Don C Killingsworth served on 4/14/2021, answer due 5/5/2021. (Hair, Barry) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BWW Inc. David Thompson served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Hair, Barry) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BWW Inc. James Brigham served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Hair, Barry) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the court should not dismiss Defendants A-Z from this action. Show Cause Response due by 4/22/2021. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 4/8/2021. (SRD) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to James Brigham, Don C Killingsworth, David Thompson. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3810660 (B4601112393). related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BWW Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (SRD). (Smith, Bradley) Modified on 4/2/2021 (MEB2). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BWW Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.