Gaddis v. Giddens et al
| Thomas Gaddis |
| United States Attorney, FBI Director, Sylacauga Police Chief, Sylacauga Drug Task Force, Steven D Giddens and Talladega County Sheriff |
| 1:2021cv00501 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS the instant matter be DISMISSED for failing to assert claims cognizable, or seek relief available, in a federal habeas corpus action and/or for failing to exhaust state court remedies. Additionally, in accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings, the undersigned RECOMMENDS a certificate of appealability be DENIED to the extent it may be required. Objections to R&R due by 6/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 5/26/2021. (KEK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing by Thomas Gaddis (KAM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Thomas Gaddis (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steven D Giddens, Sylacauga Drug Task Force, Sylacauga Police Chief, Talladega County Sheriff filed by Thomas Gaddis. (MEB2) Modified on 4/15/2021 (MEB2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
