South State Bank NA v. Teal
South State Bank NA |
Jan P Teal |
1:2021cv00789 |
June 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER governing further proceedings in this action unless modified for good cause shown: Discovery due by 2/4/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 4/11/2022; Joint Status Report due by 1/21/2022. The parties shall be ready for trial in November 2022, to be scheduled by separate order. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/6/21. (SAC) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mendez, Louis) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: The parties are instructed to review Local Rule 5.3 regarding the non-filing of discovery materials in civil cases. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/4/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles S Conerly on behalf of Jan P Teal (Conerly, Charles) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS #6 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for attorney Charles S. Conelry contingent upon payment of the $75.00 pro hac vice fee within 7 days of entry of this order. The Clerk's Office sends all orders and court notices to counsel electronically. Mr. Conelry shall register for CM/ECF Electronic Noticing via the courts website. Afterward, he may enter a notice of appearance in this case. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 7/19/21. (SAC) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3886810. (Conerly, Charles) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Charles S. Conelry by Jan P Teal. (Campbell, James) |
Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 7/6/2021.(KEK) |
Filing 4 Defendant ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Jan P Teal.(Campbell, James) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by South State Bank NA. Jan P Teal served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Mendez, Louis) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jan P Teal. Returned to plaintiff for service. (MEB2) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3861314 (B460111397). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Jan P Teal, filed by South State Bank NA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(KEK). (Mendez, Louis) Modified on 6/11/2021 (MRR, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jan P Teal, filed by South State Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: South State Bank NA v. Teal | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jan P Teal | |
Represented By: | Charles S Conerly |
Represented By: | James M Campbell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: South State Bank NA | |
Represented By: | Louis Frank Mendez |
Represented By: | Joshua D Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.