Howell et al v. Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc et al
| Ricky L Howell, Heather Howell and Wendy Lewis |
| Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc and Oxford, Alabama, City of |
| 1:2022cv00354 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Corey L Maze |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eri - Petition for removal - E.R.I.S.A. |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc, Oxford, Alabama, City of. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
Filing 15
ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot #10 Motion to Dismiss. Further instructions found within. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 4/19/2022. (SRD)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Corey L. Maze: Telephone Conference held on 4/19/2022. (SRD) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT Third Amended Complaint against Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc, Oxford, Alabama, City of, filed by Ricky L Howell, Wendy Lewis, Heather Howell.(Godwin, Lewis) |
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER: The Court SETS a telephone conference for Tuesday, April 19, 2022, at 10:30AM CST. Counsel are to call 877-873-8018 and enter access code 6714714 to participate. The Court also SUSPENDS all briefing deadlines pending that telephone conference. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 4/13/2022. (SRD)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY Brief filed by Plaintiffs Heather Howell, Ricky L Howell, Wendy Lewis re: #8 Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Heather Howell, Ricky L Howell, Wendy Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Social security document, #2 Exhibit Open Meeting Act)(Godwin, Lewis) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Jury Demand filed by Heather Howell, Ricky L Howell, Wendy Lewis. (Godwin, Lewis) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Oxford, Alabama, City of. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Stubbs, C) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: The Court GRANTS the City of Oxford's motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading. (Doc. #6 ). Its responsive pleading is now due on Friday, April 8, 2022. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 3/30/2022. (SRD)
|
| Filing 8 Brief re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Jury Demand filed by Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc. (Harrison, Alicia) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Jury Demand by Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc. (Harrison, Alicia) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Responsive Pleading by Oxford, Alabama, City of. (Stubbs, C) |
| Filing fee: $ 42, receipt number B4601119207. (KEK) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Oxford, Alabama, City of. filed by Oxford, Alabama, City of (Stubbs, C) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Oxford, Alabama, City of re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent to Removal (Stubbs, C) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by C David Stubbs on behalf of Oxford, Alabama, City of (Stubbs, C) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc (Harrison, Alicia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc from Circuit Court of Calhoun County, case number 11-CV-2020-900287.00. (), filed by Oxford Emergency Medical Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Part 1 of 3, #2 Exhibit 1 Part 2 of 3, #3 Exhibit 1 Part 3 of 3)(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
