Shaw et al v. Shaw et al

Plaintiff: Donovan Shaw, Jennifer Page Shaw and Christopher Cody Shaw
Defendant: Wendy Kay Shaw and Federal Employee Group Life Insurance
Case Number: 1:2022cv01382
Filed: October 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Wendy Kay Shaw.(Cornett, Bradley)
December 20, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service Summons/Complaint served on Wendy Kay Shaw on 12/11/2022, filed by Christopher Cody Shaw, Donovan Shaw, Jennifer Page Shaw. (Smitherman, Christopher)
December 7, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Federal Employee Group Life Insurance mailed certified mail. (KAM)
December 7, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wendy Kay Shaw delivered to plaintiff for service. (KAM)
November 29, 2022 Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Christopher Cody Shaw, Donovan Shaw, Jennifer Page Shaw. (Smitherman, Christopher)
November 17, 2022 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4213157. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Federal Employee Group Life Insurance, Wendy Kay Shaw, filed by Donovan Shaw, Jennifer Page Shaw, Christopher Cody Shaw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(KAM). (Smitherman, Christopher) NDAL rec # B-2345 Modified on 11/17/2022 (KAM).
October 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Employee Group Life Insurance, Wendy Kay Shaw, filed by Donovan Shaw, Jennifer Page Shaw, Christopher Cody Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaw et al v. Shaw et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donovan Shaw
Represented By: Christopher R Smitherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Page Shaw
Represented By: Christopher R Smitherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Cody Shaw
Represented By: Christopher R Smitherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kay Shaw
Represented By: Bradley W Cornett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Employee Group Life Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?