Russell v. LEIDOS Inc et al
Benjamin Russell |
LEIDOS Inc, Mason Livesay Scientific LLC doing business as IB3 Global Solutions LLC, PACEM Defense LLC doing business as ALS Technologies, Defense Technology LLC and Anthony W Landingham |
1:2023cv01488 |
November 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Corey L Maze |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PACEM Defense LLC. filed by PACEM Defense LLC (Wilson, David) |
Filing 32 AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiff's Complaint by PACEM Defense LLC. (Wilson, David) |
Filing 31 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Plaintiff Benjamin Russell (Russell)s Unopposed Motion to Stay Requirement Under Rule 26(f) pending the courts ruling on Defendant Anthony W. Landinghams Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 7), and Russells Motion to Remand, (doc. 9). (Doc. 21). Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 12/12/2023. (LCB) |
Filing 30 REPLY Brief filed by Plaintiff Benjamin Russell re: #23 Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Benjamin Russell. (Clay, Calvin) |
Filing 29 ANSWER to Complaint by PACEM Defense LLC.(Wilson, David) |
Filing 28 RESPONSE to re #16 Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Anthony W Landingham. (Vercher, Michael) |
Filing 27 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LEIDOS Inc. filed by LEIDOS Inc (Vercher, Michael) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting #22 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney S Greg Burge terminated. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 12/5/2023. (AMC) |
Filing 25 JOINDER in re #23 Motion in Support of Defense Technology's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by LEIDOS Inc. (Landers, Wilson) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by LEIDOS Inc.(Landers, Wilson) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand (Defendants' Consolidated Opposition) filed by Defense Technology LLC. (Goodman, John) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by PACEM Defense LLC. (Burge, S) |
Filing 21 MOTION to Stay Requirement Under Rule 26(f) by Benjamin Russell. (Clay, Calvin) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Michael Hearn on behalf of Mason Livesay Scientific LLC (Hearn, Charles) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Cecil H Macoy, Jr on behalf of Mason Livesay Scientific LLC (Macoy, Cecil) |
Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mason Livesay Scientific LLC. filed by Mason Livesay Scientific LLC (Robinson, Ben) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Mason Livesay Scientific LLC.(Robinson, Ben) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Benjamin Russell. (Clay, Calvin) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by PACEM Defense LLC (Wilson, David) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by David M Wilson on behalf of PACEM Defense LLC (Wilson, David) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Defendant PACEM Defense LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer, (doc. 11). PACEM Defense LLC's Answer is due on or before Monday, December 11, 2023. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 11/21/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: The court is in receipt of Plaintiff Benjamin Russell ("Russell")'s Motion to Remand, (doc. 9). Defendant Defense Technology LLC has on or before Monday, December 4, 2023, to file a consolidated response, in no more than 15 pages (double-spaced and size-14 font). Russell's Reply is due on or before Monday, December 11, 2023, and shall not exceed 15 pages (double-spaced and size-14 font). Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 11/21/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by PACEM Defense LLC. (Burge, S) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by S Greg Burge on behalf of PACEM Defense LLC (Burge, S) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Benjamin Russell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Clay, Calvin) |
Filing 8 ORDER: The court is in receipt of Defendant Landingham's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Russell's claims against him. Russell shall respond to the motion on or before Friday, December 1, 2023. Landingham's shall reply on or before Friday, December 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 11/17/2023. (LCB) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Anthony W Landingham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Vercher, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Vercher on behalf of LEIDOS Inc (Vercher, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Vercher on behalf of Anthony W Landingham (Vercher, Michael) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 11/3/2023. (LCB) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4462554 (B-8306). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defense Technology LLC from Circuit Court of Calhoun County Alabama, case number 11-CV-2023-900441. filed by PACEM Defense LLC, Defense Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(LCB). (Goodman, John) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defense Technology LLC. filed by Defense Technology LLC (Goodman, John) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Defense Technology LLC.(Goodman, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defense Technology LLC from Circuit Court of Calhoun County Alabama, case number 11-CV-2023-900441. filed by PACEM Defense LLC, Defense Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(LCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.