Mackey v. Henry et al
Bakari Mackey |
Daniel Henry, Nick Bowles and Andrew Howell |
1:2023cv01636 |
December 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Corey L Maze |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Andrew Howell served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024, Daniel Henry served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024 (LCB) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued by the Clerk as to Daniel Henry, Andrew Howell and delivered to USMS for service on 12/12/2023 (LCB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Pro Se Guide to Plaintiff (LCB) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Mackey's claim of false arrest against Defendants Henry and Howell as well as his 1983 claim for fabrication of evidence. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to DISMISS Nick Bowels as a defendant and to EFFECTUATE SERVICE on Henry and Howell. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 12/11/2023. (LCB) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court GRANTS #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and DENIES #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 12/11/2023. (LCB) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bakari Mackey. (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nick Bowles, Daniel Henry, Andrew Howell, filed by Bakari Mackey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.