Carroll v. United States Marshals et al
| Tracy Carroll |
| United States Marshals and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2024cv00180 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Carroll is ORDERED to file a notice within 21 days stating (1) his current mailing address and (2) whether he wishes to continue prosecuting his claims. If Carroll wishes to continue prosecuting his claims, he is FURTHER ORDERED to comply with the order entered February 16, 2024 (Doc 2) within 21 days. If Carroll fails to fully comply with this order by the deadline, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 4/1/2024. (DNW)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER The petitioner must file an amended habeas petition on the court's standard form and either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a verified application to proceed ifp within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/16/2024. (KAM)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tracy Carroll.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
