Drummond Company, Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America et al
Plaintiff: Drummond Company, Inc.
Defendant: United Mine Workers of America and United Mine Workers of America Local No. 1948
Case Number: 2:2007cv01462
Filed: August 9, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2007. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE after having received the #6 Notice of Dismissal. Costs taxed as paid. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/7/2007. (JLC, )
September 5, 2007 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Drummond Company, Inc. (Hattaway, Ashley)
August 13, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRO denying #2 Motion for TRO without prejudice to the right of pla to seek a TRO if the work stoppage occurs again. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 8/10/2007. (KSS, )
August 10, 2007 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #3 Motion for Appointment of Special Process Server. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 8/10/07. (YMB)
August 9, 2007 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United Mine Workers of America, United Mine Workers of America Local No. 1948, returned to Plaintiffs' Attorney for service. (JLC, )
August 9, 2007 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Special Process Server by Drummond Company, Inc.. (JLC, )
August 9, 2007 Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Drummond Company, Inc.. (JLC, )
August 9, 2007 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Mine Workers of America, United Mine Workers of America Local No. 1948 (Filing fee $ 350.00. receipt # 200 238915) , filed by Drummond Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC, )
August 9, 2007 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins : Motion Hearing held on 8/9/2007 re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Drummond Company, Inc. Opening remarks of court. Arguments of counsel. Order (oral) DENYING Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Written order to follow. Adj. (Court Reporter Chanetta Sinkfield.) (YMB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Drummond Company, Inc. v. United Mine Workers of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Drummond Company, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley H Hattaway
Represented By: Michael L Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Mine Workers of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Mine Workers of America Local No. 1948
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?