Chapman v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.

Plaintiff: Jessica Chapman
Defendant: Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv01247
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 22, 2013 60 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the court adopts the report of the Magistrate Judge and accepts the recommendations; It is therefore ordered that the Plaintiffs Motion to Facilitate Notice is granted as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 04/22/13. (SPT )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapman v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Chapman
Represented By: Gregory O Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?