Jensen v. Pfizer, Inc.
| Carol A. Jensen |
| Pfizer, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv02074 |
| October 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Inge P Johnson |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
COPY OF TRANSFER ORDER from Panel on Multidistrict Litigation - MDL No. 2092, Chantix (Varenicline) Products - the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Northern District of Alabama are transferred to the Northern District of Alabama a nd, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Inge P. Johnson for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (case to be transferred upon receipt of certified copy of transfer order from USDC-Alabama) (ADB, ) [Transferred from Nebraska on 10/14/2009.]
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Stay pending a ruling by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on the MDL motions referenced by the parties, all activity in the instant action shall be stayed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, ) [Transferred from Nebraska on 10/14/2009.]
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Comply with the Court's 4/20/09 Discovery Order 36 is held in abeyance pending the plaintiff's response to this order. The plaintiff shall have to on or before 7/22/09 to show cause why the plaintiff should not be compelled to produce a response using the Fact Sheet form provided by the defendant. Failure to comply with this order may be considered an abandonment of the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion. The defendant shall have to on or before 7/27/09 to file a reply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF) [Transferred from Nebraska on 10/14/2009.]
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SMS, ) [Transferred from Nebraska on 10/14/2009.]
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER regarding Status Report 29 filed by Pfizer, Inc. ; The Court hereby adopts the parties' Joint Coordinated Plan of Discovery submitted as Exhibit 1 to the parties Joint Status Report and Motion to Adopt Joint Discovery Plan [29-2]. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (PAV) [Transferred from Nebraska on 10/14/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jensen v. Pfizer, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pfizer, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Huffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carol A. Jensen | |
| Represented By: | B. Kristian W. Rasmussen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
