Energen Corporation v. CertainTeed Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Energen Corporation
Defendant: Energy Conversion Devices, Inc and CertainTeed Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00240
Filed: February 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on the informal request by the parties to extend the deadline to conduct mediation. For good cause shown, the request is GRANTED. The Mediation Order dated March 10, 2011 (Doc. #44 in 2:10-cv-02039-RDP, Doc. #40 in 2:10-cv-00240-RDP) is AMENDED as follows: The mediation shall be completed on or before May 20, 2011. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 03/30/11. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(SFR, )
March 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 TEXT ORDER-This case is before the court on the parties' Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Certain Deadlines (Doc. # 41), filed March 15, 2011. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the deadlines are extended as follows: Energen's expert report is due on or before May 27, 2011; CertainTeed's expert report is due on or before June 27, 2011; discovery is to be completed on or before August 2, 2011; and dispositive motions are due on or before August 11, 2011. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/16/2011. (AVC)
March 15, 2011 Filing 41 Joint MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Certain Deadlines by Energen Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Denniston, Michael) Modified on 3/16/2011 (AVC).
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEDIATION ORDER- This case is appropriate for mediation. The parties are DIRECTED to select a mediator from the Court Panel of Neutrals or an alternate mediator agreed upon by the parties within ten (10) days of the date on which this order is filed. Once a mediator is selected, the parties are to notify the court's Courtroom Deputy. The mediation shall be completed by 4/29/2011. Within ten (10) days following mediation, the mediator will report to the court only that a settlement was reached or mediation was conducted and no settlement agreements were reached, whether each party acted in good faith to resolve the matter, and nothing more. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/10/2011. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
December 28, 2010 Filing 39 ANSWER to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by Energen Corporation.Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Denniston, Michael)
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Energen Corporation's unopposed Motion for Leave to File Answer to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (10cv240 Doc. # 37; 10cv2039 Doc. # 41), filed December 27, 2010. The motion is GRANTED. Energen Corporation is DIRECTED to file the proposed Answer with the Clerk of the Court. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/28/10. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(SFR, )
December 27, 2010 Filing 37 MOTION for Leave to File Answer to Complaint for Declaratory Judgment by Energen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Answer)Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Denniston, Michael)
December 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 TEXT ORDER- This matter is before the court on the Motion for Leave to Withdraw (10cv240, Doc. # 35; 10cv2039, Doc. # 39), filed December 22, 2010, by attorney Brian M. Vines, The motion is GRANTED, Attorney Vines is terminated. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/27/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
December 22, 2010 Filing 35 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Motion of Brian Vines for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel of Record by Energen Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Vines, Brian)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 AMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL-This case is before the court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 32 . It is hereby ORDERED that the action against defendant Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/6/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER OF DISMISSAL-This case is before the court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 32 (Doc# 36 in 2:10-cv-02039-RDP). In light of the stipulation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc# 27 in 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, Doc# 31 in 2:10-cv-02039-RDP) is MOOT. It is hereby ORDERED that the action against Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/6/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
October 5, 2010 Filing 32 JOINT Stipulation of Dismissal of Energy Conversion Devices by Energen Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Vines, Brian) Modified on 10/6/2010 (AVC).
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 TEXT ORDER-The briefing schedule on the Motion of Defendant Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. # 27), filed September 24, 2010 is revised as follows: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion is due on or before October 7, 2010. Any reply by Defendant is due on or before October 12, 2010. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/28/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 TEXT ORDER-This matter is before the court on the Motion of Defendant Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. # 27), filed September 24, 2010. Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion is due on or before September 30, 2010. Any reply by Defendant is due on or before October 5, 2010. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/28/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 SCHEDULING ORDER: that certain time limits apply as set out in this order; Amended Pleadings due by 12/15/2010. Discovery due by 6/3/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 7/11/2011. Pretrial in September 2011; Mediation Order March 2011. This case will be trial ready in October 2011. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 09/27/10. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(CVA)
September 24, 2010 Filing 28 Brief re(31 in 2:10-cv-02039-RDP) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Burkholder, David)
September 24, 2010 Filing 27 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Burkholder, David)
September 24, 2010 Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by CertainTeed Corporation.Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Burkholder, David)
September 17, 2010 Filing 25 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(Denniston, Michael)
August 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER- It is hereby ORDERED, the March 8, 2010 stay is LIFTED and Case No. 2:10-cv-240-RDP and 2:10-cv-2039-RDP are CONSOLIDATED. In the future, all pleadings or other documents should be electronically filed only in the lead case, Case No. 2:10-CV-240-RDP, but should bear the style set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/18/2010. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-00240-RDP, 2:10-cv-02039-RDP(AVC)
August 18, 2010 Filing 23 TEXT ENTRY ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's informal request to reschedule the Scheduling Conference, currently set for Wednesday, September 29, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Without objection, the request is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference is RESET to 9/27/2010 at 2:00 PM in the judge's chambers, located at the Hugo L Black US Courthouse, in Birmingham, AL before Judge R David Proctor. (KLL)
August 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 TEXT ORDER-This matter is before the court on the parties' Joint Motion to Continue Deadlines (Doc. # 21) filed August 10, 2010. The parties' motion seeks an approximately one-month extension of (1) the deadline to meet and confer regarding a proposed scheduling order, and (2) the scheduling conference. While the court is surprised as to the length of time requested to accomplish such simple matters, it is willing to trust that counsel requires the extension; therefore, the motion is GRANTED. The scheduling conference previously set at 10:00 a.m. on August 18, 2010 is RE-SET for 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday September 29. 2010. Counsel shall meet and confer regarding a schedule for discovery and file a proposed scheduling order on or before Wednesday, September 18, 2010. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/11/2010. (AVC)
August 10, 2010 Filing 21 Joint MOTION to Continue Deadlines by CertainTeed Corporation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (Burkholder, David)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TEXT ORDER - This case is SET for a scheduling conference at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, August 18, 2010, in chambers of the undersigned located at 730 Hugo L. Black United States Courthouse,1729 5th Avenue North, Birmingham, Alabama. On or before Wednesday, August 11, 2010, counsel shall meet and confer regarding a schedule for discovery and file a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 08/06/10. (SFR, )
July 28, 2010 Filing 19 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Energen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Order granting Motion to Transfer)(Vines, Brian) Modified on 7/29/2010 (AVC).
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on the Joint Status Report filed June 30, 2010 (Doc. # 17). In light of the matters contained therein, this matter shall remain STAYED. On or before September 1, 2010, or within three (3) days of a decision on the pending motion(s) in the New York case, Case No. 10-CV-0377-SHS, whichever occurs first, the parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report informing this court of that court's decision. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 07/01/10. (SFR, )
June 30, 2010 Filing 17 JOINT STATUS REPORT in Response to 5-11-2010 Order by Energen Corporation. (Vines, Brian) Modified on 6/30/2010 (AVC).
May 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on the Joint Status Report filed May 10, 2010 (Doc. # 15). In light of the matters contained therein, this matter shall remain STAYED. On or before July 1, 2010 or within three (3) days of a decision on the pending motion(s) in the New York case, Case No. 10-CV-0377-SHS, whichever occurs first, the parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report informing this court of that court's decision. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 05/11/10. (SFR, )
May 10, 2010 Filing 15 STATUS REPORT Joint Report of Status of New York Proceeding by Energen Corporation. (Vines, Brian)
March 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 13 Joint MOTION to Stay; on or before 5/7/2010, the parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report regarding the status of the New York case; furthemore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE dfts' 6 MOTION to Dismiss, Transfer and/or Stay. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/8/2010. (KSS, )
March 5, 2010 Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay by Energen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Vines, Brian)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER - Before the court are two Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice seeking the pro hac vice admission of Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. and M. Kelly Tillery (Docs. # 9 and 10), filed March 2, 2010. The Motions (Docs. # 9 and 10) are GRANTED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 03/03/10. (SFR, )
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ALND UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS reminding parties of their obligations under FRCP26(f) and LR26.1(d) - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/2/2010. (KSS, )
March 2, 2010 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave for M. Kelly Tillery to Appear Pro Hac Vice by CertainTeed Corporation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (KSS, )
March 2, 2010 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave for Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr., to Appear Pro Hac Vice by CertainTeed Corporation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (KSS, )
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re 6 MOTION to Dismiss, the parties SHALL brief the issues raised by dfts' motion in accordance with Exhibit B attached, any non-summary judgment motions filed after the entry of this order, SHALL comply with attached Exhibit B. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/2/2010. (KSS, )
March 1, 2010 Filing 7 Brief Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion of Defendants Certainteed Corporation and Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. to Dismiss, Transfer and/or Stay. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7)(Tankersley, Will)
March 1, 2010 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Motion of Defendants Certainteed Corporation and Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. to Dismiss, Transfer and/or Stay by CertainTeed Corporation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachments 1-4)(Tankersley, Will)
February 22, 2010 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Energen Corporation. Energy Conversion Devices, Inc served on 2/15/2010, answer due 3/8/2010. (Vines, Brian)
February 12, 2010 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Energen Corporation. CertainTeed Corporation served on 2/8/2010, answer due 3/1/2010. (Vines, Brian)
February 2, 2010 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CertainTeed Corporation, Energy Conversion Devices, Inc., delivered to plaintiff for service. (KSS, )
February 2, 2010 Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Energen Corporation. (KSS, )
February 1, 2010 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants (Filing fee $ 350.00, receipt # B4601009236.), filed by Energen Corporation.(KSS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Energen Corporation v. CertainTeed Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Energy Conversion Devices, Inc
Represented By: Christopher D Olszyk, Jr
Represented By: David R Burkholder
Represented By: M Kelly Tillery
Represented By: Will Hill Tankersley, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CertainTeed Corporation
Represented By: Will Hill Tankersley, Jr
Represented By: Christopher D Olszyk, Jr
Represented By: David R Burkholder
Represented By: M Kelly Tillery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Energen Corporation
Represented By: Brian M Vines
Represented By: Joseph B Mays, Jr
Represented By: Michael S Denniston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?